Supporting community awareness and impact to create the future.
At 1245-1265 West 10th Avenue, a 20-storey tower rezoning. Public consult Mar 20 to April 2. Demoviction of two existing rental buildings. Shadow studies incorrect. With 2 towers on block and a 3rd under construction, this may violate Broadway Plan.
A total of 164 rental units are proposed under the Broadway Plan’s provision to have 20% at below market rental prices. The unit makeup would have 83 bachelor, 24 one-bed, 40 two-bed and 17 three-bed units. Fifty parking stalls for residents (out of 61 total) would be included in 3 underground levels. A total building height of 64.9m (213 ft.) is being proposed with a FSR of 6.5. To put the building height into perspective, “The Independent,” a 21-storey tower at Kingsway and East 10th, has a building height of 215 ft and a FSR of 5.5.
There’s no information in the materials about the property owner; the application has been submitted by Stuart Howard Architects Inc. We’d like to learn more about who is behind the project, to help connect the dots about who is active in the Broadway Plan area. Who are the beneficial owners?
Two existing rental buildings make up the lot assembly (with a condo as the third building) for this application. It might be worth visiting the description that CBRE had for the two rental buildings in their “South Granville Apartment Portfolio” when these were for up for sale (see live link here, and archived here). The existing rental buildings fall under RM-3 zoning (max FSR 1.65). The current zoning has a minimum front yard depth of 6.1m (20 ft) while the rezoning has a scant 3.66m (12 ft.) setback for the main building (so this would be a massive wall going straight up very close to the sidewalk).
It is disappointing to see Vancouver descending into bad urban design.
Renters in the existing buildings may be concerned about their future and are encouraged to read up and network. The Vancouver Tenants Union website (https://www.vancouvertenantsunion.ca/) provides resources regarding tenant rights, including tips on dealing with relocation and demoviction under the Broadway Plan. An article by Nathan Crompton in The Mainlander provides a detailed analysis of a similar situation of demovictions under the Broadway Plan. See “Broadway Plan Touches Down: Redevelopment at 25–55 East 12th Ave.” Tenants affected by all of this may also wish to communicate their views to an industry-spawned activist group named “Abundant Housing Vancouver,” which has aggressively lobbied for supply-at-any-cost government policies and treats existing renters as collateral damage. They need some feedback on the impacts of their actions.
The shadow diagrams included with the application are incorrect. This year, the spring equinox fell on March 19th, so we took photos at 10am and 12pm around the site for checking the direction of the shadows (more on that later).
The Broadway Plan has specific policy in place with capping the maximum number of towers per block:
9.9.2: “There will be a maximum of two towers per block (street to street, including any laneways). On blocks with two or more existing towers constructed prior to adoption of the Broadway Plan, one additional tower will be considered. However, for the northern block faces along 10th Avenue and the northern block face along 13th Avenue between Oak Street and Laurel Street, only one tower will be allowed on the Fairview South Area A block face.”
There are two existing towers on this block at 1258 and 1268 West Broadway (across the laneway from the rezoning site). As the tower at 2538 Birch Street (Denny’s site) wasn’t constructed prior to the adoption of the Broadway Plan, would that leave no room for additional towers on this block? Could section 9.9.2 of the Broadway Plan be literally interpreted this way?
The shadow studies included with the applicant’s booklet are incorrect. We documented shadows on the spring equinox in the field to compare for ourselves. There are the expressions “don’t trust your lying eyes”, and “seeing is believing”, so here are a few comparisons:
2 thoughts on “At 1245-1265 West 10th Avenue, a 20-storey tower rezoning. Public consult Mar 20 to April 2. Demoviction of two existing rental buildings. Shadow studies incorrect. With 2 towers on block and a 3rd under construction, this may violate Broadway Plan.”
This application, and many others like, it demonstrate that the Broadway Plan is not a ‘plan’ so much as a wholesale giveaway to unfettered development, regardless of urban context. That’s the antithesis of good urban design. There are other, and far better, ways of achieving housing intensification, which I support (I’m not at all opposed to development provided it’s smart, appropriately scaled, and responsive to its context). Also, I’m not convinced that the entitlements envisioned under the Broadway Plan will actually deliver really affordable housing at scale. The devil is in the details.
This is just the tip of the development iceberg that we are now seeing. Stand by for more.
Great reporting, thanks for this. I remember being at one of the nights of the public hearing for what became The Independent. In fairness to then council, they took the time and extended to several nights the consultation and over a hundred speakers got to say their piece. However, having heard the largely disapproving feedback, the Vision-dominated Council then rubberstamped it anyway, which was the start of oversize towers on Broadway east of Cambie.
I didn’t think it was possible for a council to be worse than Vision when it came to listening to the public, but here we are.
This application, and many others like, it demonstrate that the Broadway Plan is not a ‘plan’ so much as a wholesale giveaway to unfettered development, regardless of urban context. That’s the antithesis of good urban design. There are other, and far better, ways of achieving housing intensification, which I support (I’m not at all opposed to development provided it’s smart, appropriately scaled, and responsive to its context). Also, I’m not convinced that the entitlements envisioned under the Broadway Plan will actually deliver really affordable housing at scale. The devil is in the details.
This is just the tip of the development iceberg that we are now seeing. Stand by for more.
Great reporting, thanks for this. I remember being at one of the nights of the public hearing for what became The Independent. In fairness to then council, they took the time and extended to several nights the consultation and over a hundred speakers got to say their piece. However, having heard the largely disapproving feedback, the Vision-dominated Council then rubberstamped it anyway, which was the start of oversize towers on Broadway east of Cambie.
I didn’t think it was possible for a council to be worse than Vision when it came to listening to the public, but here we are.