To contact us, please write citizenYVR@gmail.com.
This figure summarizes the core issues we are dealing with in Vancouver.
Tools are available to fix things, and society as a whole could do so taking actions and adopting policies to address each component on this cycle. CityHallWatch picks up on many of these in our coverage and advocacy. For example, we put the spotlight on the role of media in the cycle — pointing out codes of conduct, and the roles/responsibilities of the owners and managers of the mainstream media. Regarding donations, we put the spotlight on legislation needed to fix things. We submit requests to City Hall under Freedom of Information (FOI) legislation. We challenge statements made by officials and politicians. Most of this costs nothing but some time. We invite other individuals and organizations to target parts of this system that concern them, and get to work too.
CityHallWatch Media Foundation (a registered BC society)
Our purposes are:
(1) To provide an educational platform, primarily but not exclusively web-based, for citizens to obtain information and tools to better understand and be engaged in civic government processes and decisions that affect them, particularly in the City of Vancouver.
(2) To support efforts to make public institutions socially-just, transparent, accountable, integrity-based, environmentally-sustainable, and fiscally-sound.
(3) To engage in activities that support the above-stated purposes.
WHAT IS CITYHALLWATCH ALL ABOUT? MIRROR, MAGNIFIER, MICROPHONE.
Our slogan is “Speak the truth. Expect the truth.”
What will Vancouver look like in the future? Neighbourhoods deserve a say in how their communities change. Many players and interests influence City Council’s decisions. We aim to balance the game by providing information to connect the dots, and to give citizens the confidence and tools to engage City Hall effectively. Systemic change is needed.
But change will only start from outside — from citizens. Our only tools are a mirror, a magnifier, and a microphone.
The mirror is used to reflect the actions and words of all those in the civic development “system” (elected officials, public servants, developers, architects, consultants, committees, civic leaders, and even the media) so that they may themselves see what they look like to observers.
The magnifier is the case-study approach we take to examine more closely specific rezoning and development applications, as well as policies.
And the microphone is one function of this website — to give voice to people who wish to speak out by providing us comments (through the comment function) or even anonymously (as some experts cannot say what they think, due to concern about risking future contracts, funding, and reputation). (Comment policy: We publish most comments, but screen out anything that appears to be unrelated to the story, containing personal information, or racist, sexist, homophobic, hate speech, potentially libelous, spam, or trolls.)
Our main focus is the City of Vancouver, Canada, but we realize that what we witness here is a microcosm of the entire Metro Vancouver region, as well as British Columbia, Canada and the world.
What we see here is not uncommon around the world. We hope that through our efforts, our society as a whole can learn and become wiser and more just.
Our ultimate goal is a socially and environmentally sustainable, livable, equitable city and region, with good fiscal management, running on a system based on trust and the creative energy of the people, plus the good governance and accountability of our elected officials and public servants.
We ask readers to be forgiving, as this website is run on a budget of zero, and counts on volunteer time from contributors. Some pages may be out of date, but we do our best to keep them fresh. We welcome corrections.
We point out that individual, grassroots movements and community organizations are up against powerful, mostly privately-held companies (many on which no information about executives and directors is publicly available, many financed by offshore money and speculation, some of them even just numbered companies) many of which have made campaign contributions in the most expensive civic election in BC history, a group of councillors in Vancouver who wield absolute power (7 out of 11 votes), and the highly paid professional services and consultants that only large corporations can afford.
Our constant question is this: Who is looking after the public interest? Please stand up and make yourselves known.
MORE ABOUT CITYHALLWATCH.CA
The choice of where to live is one of the most important decisions in every person’s life. You choose a place for many reasons. But did you know that each neighbourhood comes with certain policies, rules and regulations that may not be visible on the street but affect every aspect of urban planning and life. Zoning is determined by “community plans” and “zoning guidelines” and so on. So what is “re-zoning”? It’s the act of changing the permitted types of buildings, land uses, heights, and much more.
When zoning changes or policies change, there are often winners and losers in each case. The job of our civic government is to protect the public interest while recognizing fair opportunities for business. Decisions by our elected officials should happen in an open, fair, and transparent way so that everyone in civil society knows what is being changed, what is being gained, and what is being lost. And that’s what this website is for — to help us figure this all out together.
- Ongoing case studies of CityHallWatch are shown in the drop-down menus on this site. More will be added as time goes by. We encourage people who know the details of these case to continue providing updates. These case studies illustrate how our public servants, elected officials, and development industry speak and act. By their actions will they be known.
- Our contact address is citizenYVR [at] gmail.com. The founder and coordinator is Randy Helten. For research and articles, we have about ten contributors and we also receive tips and information from many sources, from all over the city. Some contributors of material are named, but some prefer to not be named, an arrangement that permits them to speak their truth. Editorial decisions are made based on consultations in good faith with knowledgeable citizens and networks across the city. Information comes from scores of people, with hundreds of years of cumulative experience dealing with City Hall. Grassroots activists, regular citizens, and professionals in many fields.
- CityHallWatch is not against change and development, and is not against any specific form of development. We are for a fair, open and transparent decision-making system that is accountable to the public.
- As time goes by, this website will examine a series of important rezoning and development applications and provide a forum for public discussion and sharing of views.
- CityHallWatch is non-partisan. Praise where praise is due. Present the facts available.
- We try to look at the facts objectively, regardless of where they come from. We count on input provided by anyone, by name or anonymously. Besides input from citizens, we welcome especially contributions from academics, consultants, professionals, students (of policy, architecture, planning, etc.) who may offer their analysis in the spirit of public service.
- Each player in the development game is expected to act in good faith, and has in important role to play in making a city work fairly and equitably. In addition, professionals are often bound by a code of conduct. Some corporations (but not all) also have declared policies on “corporate social responsibility,” which often include guidelines on consultation, ethics, and good governance.
- It is often difficult for citizens to follow these complex issues and processes of rezonings, policies and major decisions. Things often move very quickly in rezoning. The extent of public notification is limited. Documents are technical. The public may only get a few days notice for major decisions in City Council. It’s also hard to learn what other people are thinking. Open houses where developers show their designs are drop-in events lasting a few hours, so people don’t get the chance to air their views publicly. It is hoped that this website will help citizens understand things better.
- When it comes to rezonings, policies, and other major decisions, City staff write reports with their recommendations to Council. They summarize many thousands of words from hundreds of letters of public comments into a couple hundred words. That summary is all the public sees. As soon as a decision is “referred” to Public Hearing, you are likely to find the wall coming up in any communications with your elected officials on the topic (see our findings here). Then comes the Public Hearing at the very end of the process. The way the City currently operates (preferring small groups and drop-in format open houses) this is often the only chance for people to hear what other citizens are thinking. But alas, by the time of the public hearing, our elected officials in City Council have usually made their decision or decided in caucus. Council members often wait for the time go by as citizens passionately make their appeals. Often the developer “stacks the deck” by calling in people to speak in favor of the application (sometimes coordinated by communications consultants) — typically individuals or groups who stand to benefit, having been singled out to be on the receiving end. Then the formal decision is done and the implementation begins …. This has been the typical way of the world in Vancouver for years, and it’s getting worse.
- Maybe it’s possible to change things for the better. We shall see….
We welcome submissions and suggestions. If you’d like a public hearing, rezoning, open house or other event/item promoted and advertised, please send an e-mail. It helps to have the relevant web links, the key facts in concise form, plus some bullet points beyond the straight facts. What are the implications for the community? What is the policy context? What’s right? What’s wrong? What action should people take?