Election 2011 Accountability

CityHallWatch “Election 2011 Accountability Project”

On election day, November 19, 2011, CityHallWatch announced the launch of the “Vancouver Election 2011 Accountability Project,” to review the words and actions of all the stakeholders that influenced the election process, and take the pulse of our democracy. The key question: Did each of the players act in a way that strengthens our democracy and justifies the trust our society puts in it? This project, to be conducted over the coming months, will include reviews of these roles below. Fresh reading material will be added as we notice it. For a collection of our coverage on campaign contributions, click “Campaign Contributions” on the “tag cloud” at the bottom right of your screen. 


  • Elector organizations, political parties
  • Mainstream media
  • Independent media
  • Unions (Reading: http://www.citycaucus.com/2012/01/taxpayer-interests-vs-union-interests)
  • Developers, Corporations
  • Other major campaign funders
  • Pollsters
  • Community organizations
  • City staff
  • Consultants, commentators, academics and experts
  • Federal and provincial politicians and their parties
  • Endorsers of parties and candidates (overlaps with some of above)
  • Online bloggers and commenters, both anonymous and known
  • Volunteers and paid workers who promoted candidates and parties

This review will look at the roles of these players in the process, and, we hope, act as a mirror to show us how our democracy and civil society are functioning today. The review will be a valuable initiative and help put the future actions and decisions of Vancouver City Council into the context of the outcomes of the November 19 election. Did the players deal fairly? Was public disclosure of relationships and interests adequate? Ask lots of questions. As a society, let’s talk this over. We welcome collaborators, submissions and tips. E-mail citizenYVR@gmail.com.


  1. https://cityhallwatch.wordpress.com/2011/11/20/accountability-project-file-1-mainstream-media-shannon-mews-rezoning-and-election-2011/
  2. CityHallWatch campaign contribution information 2008, 2011
  3. More coming


Websites for the civic parties

Their governance documents

Vision Vancouver constitution is here
COPE’s constitution is here.
NPA philosophy is here.
NSV principles are on their website.

Some questions to consider: How do they develop policy and make decisions, both before election and after election? Who does it? When? Are members allowed to vote differently from what their party tells them? What are their campaign financing policies? Do they accept donations from parties that can benefit from council or board decisions, particularly relating to large contracts and land developments (e.g., developers, unions, etc.)? What are the interests and objectives of the largest donors? What is the voting record of incumbents compared to their campaign promises, both explicit and implicit? Do candidates declare their philosophy, beliefs, and objects as individuals (they appear as individuals on the ballot) are are they directed by their “party,” or do they speak for themselves?

The Yin and Yang of Elections:

Every politician and political system contains both yin and yang, the dark and the light. In the 2011 Vancouver civic election you can expect each political spin machine to point out the negatives especially in the other “parties” and other candidates. But none of them are all bad and none of them are all good. And sometimes good and bad depends on your own personal, corporate, or organization’s interests. CityHallWatch takes the citizen and neighbourhood view of things. During campaigns, hopeful politicians and their organizations make promises. But promises are just promises — what counts is how politicians act after elected. If you’d like to see the performance of those currently on Council, have a look at their voting record on important community issues 2008 to 2011 here, at Vancouver Council Votes.

2011 civic election campaign finance info and analysis.

[Update Nov 2012]

Specific data for Vision Vancouver, the winning party, is here for download in PDF and Excel formats.

To be continued.

One thought on “Election 2011 Accountability

  1. The following media advisory was issued this afternoon:

    All-Candidates Meeting Confirmed for DTES Friday, November 4, 2011

    [Tuesday, November 1, 2011 – Vancouver]: The Urban Core Community Workers Association (Urban Core) will be hosting an All-Candidates Meeting for the upcoming civic election in Vancouver this Friday, November 4, 2011 from 5 to 6:30pm at Pathways Information Centre, located at 390 Main Street in Vancouver’s downtown eastside (DTES).

    What: 2011 Vancouver Civic Election All-candidates Meeting in the DTES
    Where: 390 Main Street, Vancouver
    When: Friday, November 4, 2011 from 5-6:30pm

    The meeting will be moderated by Heather O’Hara, Executive Director of the Potluck Cafe Society, and is expected to cover issues of most concern to residents, businesses and other agencies operating in the DTES.

    The following candidates have confirmed their participation on the panel (with other candidates from each party also attending):

    Vision Vancouver: Andrea Reimer
    COPE: Ellen Woodsworth
    Green Party: Adriane Carr
    NPA: (unnamed candidate)
    NSV: Terry Martin
    Independent: Sandy Garossino

    Media are asked to sign in at the door. Camera positions will be saved near the front but space is limited so first come first serve. Due to the location and other constraints, no audio feed is available.

    Carol A. Madsen
    Program Director
    Pathways Information Centre and C.E.D.
    Tradeworks Training Society
    390 Main Street
    Vancouver, BC
    604-682-7353 (ext 26)

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s