Bike share bid extended to Sept 14. Vision executive is an interested party. Concerns about process

London bike share

London bike share

The City of Vancouver has extended the deadline for bike share proposals by two weeks until September 14, 2015. While the extra time for the process will likely result in a better response to the City’s requests for proposals (RFP), a significant number of concerns remain about the procurement process.

The City recently released a list of interested vendors; these vendors attended an information meeting on Friday, July 24th. Among the “interested vendors” was the Earnscliffe Strategy Group represented by Brittney Kerr. Ms. Kerr is a long time member of the Vision Vancouver executive, and to the best of our knowledge, the lobbyist firm Earnscliffe has no experience operating bike share systems or in providing bike share equipment. The question of conflict of interest needs to be answered, whether it is real or perceived. Should the executive of the ruling party at City Hall work on a bike share bid, and will the process appear to be fair to all?

The list of interested vendors totals 20 groups; however, it appears that only 4 or 5 of the parties are serious “contenders” who have vast experience with bike share systems. Motivate International, the successor to Alta Bike Share is an interested vendor. City Council chose Alta Bike Share to run the bike share system back in July of 2013; this has been since scrapped. MetroNews reported that the RFP is very open-ended. The City will let the interested firms chose locations for distributing between 1,000 and 3,800 bikes in the Core Area of Vancouver.

Are there are a number of serious flaws in the RFP? The City’s Purchasing Department seeks to find a complete solution with a single firm to source public bike share technology and to run the system. The lack of guidance on bike share locations will result in costly bids for any party that wishes to bid. Potential suppliers need to be confident that it is a fair and transparent procurement process; otherwise the Purchasing Department could potentially discourage qualified firms from submitting bids.

The other option the City could have considered is to make two rounds of bike share selection. The first round could be to determine the most suitable technology to be used (find an equipment supplier) and to locate a helmet supplier. Then a second round could be used to find sponsors and find an operator. A rigorous procurement process could also produce a firm specification with an exact number of bikes and a complete list of stations to deploy the technology at. There’s no standard to judge all proposals against. Certain parties that are privy to additional information (i.e. from the earlier round of bike share bids) could be perceived to have an advantage.

It was revealed in recently released Q & A document that no changes are planned in the helmet requirements for bike share. The City of Vancouver will not lobby the Legislature for any future changes to the current mandatory helmet law. Additional details on the Public Bike Share RFP can be found on the City’s website.

References
City issues new Bike Share Request for Proposals: Deadlines approaching. Can Vancouver get a world-class system? (CityHallWatch, June 18, 2015)
Wanted: New Vancouver bike share supplier (Metro News, Emily Jackson, July 20, 2015)

3 thoughts on “Bike share bid extended to Sept 14. Vision executive is an interested party. Concerns about process

  1. As federal election begins one of the issues will be bike share and vision Vancouver, our goal is to get rid of vision Vancouver and provide no federal funding until bikers and cyclists start paying fees!

  2. at the rfp info meeting it certainly appears possible that brittney was double-or-triple billing (Justin Trudeau’s Federal Campaign, other BC Earnscliffe Accounts and/or Vision or the Mayor’s Office Budget), moonlighting as well as misrepresenting why she was there in exclaiming something to the tune of, “I’m here as hairself!”.

    In hindsight, the rapid pace of tweets, texts and in and out phone action of this under thirty seemed to be working all sides of the street not only in Vancouver and Richmond but across the country. Gee, now the brewing Liberal King Maker Scandal in Richmond reveals that the Brittney, Braden and Gregor are bloodletting Trudeau’s Federal Campaign. Speaking of blood letting ask a latest and former UBC President about the personal cost of “a subway or the highway”.

    • This UBC former president clown did not understand we did not want this to became a International University for his Indian friends and relatives India, we must stop China Chinese being enrolled in UBC they are security risk

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s