Vision set to take all 7 posts at Metro Vancouver Board. A very unfair, unrepresentative move

Metro Board 2014

The most important governance body in the region, Metro Vancouver Board of Directors, is comprised of elected officials from each of the municipalities in the region. Elected, that is, in their home municipalities, but not specifically selected by the public to represent them at the Metro region. That selection is done internally by each City Council.

Since it first got control of City Hall, Vision Vancouver has consistently claimed 100% for itself the power to represent over 600,000 citizens of the City of Vancouver at the regional level. Is this fair and equitable representation for the Vancouver citizens?

Citizens and governments across the region should sit up and note that the actions and votes of Vancouver Directors may not be representative of the public interests or the wishes of Vancouver citizens. Especially since Vancouver has such power at the Metro level.

Metro Vancouver HQ in Burnaby

Metro Vancouver Headquarters in Burnaby

The City of Vancouver has the largest population in the region, and has the largest contingent allocated to Metro Board, with 7 Directors. At the Regional District Level, Vancouver Directors combine for a total of 24% of the vote (or 31 weighted votes out of 129). The votes are allocated based on formula that uses the population of each municipality.

At the inaugural meeting of Council starting at 5 pm on Monday, December 8, 2014 (see agenda here), there is a proposal to again fill the positions for all 7 directors for the City of Vancouver with Vision Vancouver mayor and councillors. Is this a fair representation for Vancouver?

We urge citizens and elected officials to have a good discussion during the meeting about how things have worked since Vision controlled Council starting in 2008. Have they consulted the rest of City Council adequately regarding Vancouver’s votes at the Metro region? Have they shared information adequately? Have they shared power? The other parties on City Council (NPA and Green) have a right to protest the proposed appointments and seek more fairness.

The mayor of a municipality is generally one of the representatives on Metro Board (where there is a mayor). Hence Mayor Gregor Robertson should have a seat there. But what about the remaining 6 seats? If our civic government was fair, would it not allocate these votes fairly?

Election results show that Vision Councillor candidates received 31.8% of the total votes that were cast (462,384 out of 1,452,811) in the November 2014 election. The NPA received 32.7% (475,210) — a higher number than Vision. The Green Party was at 11.6% (or 168,163 for 3 candidates). Yet Vision took a total of 6 out of the 10 seats for Council, with the NPA receiving 3 seats and the Greens 1 seat. Does Vision Vancouver really believe it has a mandate now to take all of the seats on Metro Vancouver Board?

pie chart votes vv and non-Vision 2014 pie chart 2014 Council percent

The only time that one of the NPA or Green Party Councillors can take part of in a Metro Vancouver Board or Committee meeting is when they are designated as an alternate Director. Few people know this, and few people are watching, but we are: Vision Vancouver Councillors have a poor track record of sharing information from Metro Vancouver with other non-Vision members of Council. They also rarely let their alternates know that they will be absent (Stevenson and Jang in particular). In such cases, the votes allocated to that Vancouver Director are lost, wasted. The practice of not letting alternates attend Metro meetings potentially harms the interests of Vancouverites, as the votes from alternate directors may be needed on close votes. If someone wanted to pursue this topic, it could be the basis for a challenge under the Vancouver Code of Conduct, which requires City elected officials and staff to put the public interest above all else.

metroboard_2015_recommendation, COLOUR-CODED

As a gesture of good faith, should Mayor Robertson suggest that NPA and/or Green Party Councillors are also appointed full Directors at Metro Vancouver Board? Also, what is the role of mainstream media in all this? Do they look the other way? Or do the take the time to explain the importance of Metro Board to the residents of Vancouver? And monitor the behaviour of Vancouver Directors on the Metro Board?


Though most (if not all) local municipalities have live web video transmissions, plus archived video, of all City Council and committee meetings, Metro Vancouver does not. CityHallWatch and MetroVanWatch have been calling for this service at the Metro Vancouver level for years. At the moment the only video stream provided at the Metro Vancouver level is for Board meetings — but it is only provided live (during the meeting) and NOT archived online. And committee meetings are NOT recorded on video. Combine this with the fact that many Board meetings handle only minor administrative matters before going “in camera” (meaning CLOSED to the public and NOT recorded), and we have a large bureaucracy that is NOT publicly accountable. Voting records are usually not kept.

It is time for Metro Vancouver to get with the program and provide live and archived video of ALL Board and Committee meetings. It is not rocket science. (And in fact Metro already provides video for general meetings, such as the Sustainability Breakfasts and other outreach activities.)

Metro Vancouver, what are you trying to hide?

5 thoughts on “Vision set to take all 7 posts at Metro Vancouver Board. A very unfair, unrepresentative move

  1. As Jeff Lee is one of the journalists covering municipal affairs for a major media outlet – we can expect more of the same —- the love affair between himself and Vision. Nothing will get reported unless he told to do so.

  2. As expected, only sorry when he needs ur vote. True color reveals itself soon enuf for those who care to take a closer look beyond the 15 second sound byte.
    A country was fooled by propaganda of racial superiority & a 3rd reich of 1000 yrs….
    Propaganda led a coalition of UN forces to destroy Iraq to remove Saddam Hussein’s nonexistent WMD…
    Vancouver is fooled by propaganda of “affordable” high density micro-sized condo highrise glass towers in the “greenest” city plan.
    The modus operandi is the same; feed the people with enough BS until they believe its the truth, discredit & suppress the freepress or manipulate the media; silence the opposition by available ways & means.
    The actors & the times r changed but the play is the same.

    • Come on, Albert. What’s wrong with “high density micro-sized condo highrise glass towers”? Who do they hurt?

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s